I also make music and love technology. EEML is not an academic project — it is an honest attempt to formalise something I see. The mathematical structure holds. The rest is work in progress.
EEML began as a philosophical intuition and grew into a layered framework connecting philosophy, mathematics and physics. The core idea is simple:
Only what can effortlessly sustain itself exists.
What began as a personal conviction is now a falsifiable working hypothesis — with concrete mathematical derivations, clearly bounded open points (like a₆ on K3), and multiple falsification routes via existing and planned experimental work.
What did that beginning look like? The very first written form (±2020, with cups, bananas and "everything, yes everything") is on the site in full, with annotations on what survived and what fell. To The Origin →
EEML is not peer-reviewed. It is not a published paper. It is the work of someone who carried an idea for ten years and decided to develop it seriously. The mathematical core holds — the numerical physical predictions are work in progress. Every claim has an honest label.
For the curious lay reader: start with the philosophy page. Each section has an intuitive layer. You do not need to master mathematics to follow the core ideas.
For the scientist: the mathematics and physics pages contain the formal derivations with explicit status labels per claim. The chain page shows logical dependencies. The status page documents open points and retracted claims.
Thanks to Silas van Bezu for philosophical sparring and sharpening the core ideas.
Thanks to Claude AI (Anthropic) for processing and formalising the philosophical framework that I concluded.