A checked calculation does not verify a universal physical law. Labels apply to the stated result and its assumptions.
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Starting point / postulate | Philosophical position or additional hypothesis; not a measurement. |
| Model input | Chosen states, conditions, costs, measure, parameters or dynamics. |
| Conditionally derived | A consequence within stated assumptions. |
| Formally derived | The exact theorem has a checked formal proof; its physical assumptions remain inputs. |
| Calculated example | A reproducible synthetic computation, not an observation of nature. |
| Experimental measurement | An observation with source and uncertainty; input is not a prediction. |
| Research protocol / open | A testing procedure or unresolved question. |
| Historical-revised | An earlier claim that has been withdrawn or restricted. |
| Claim | Current status |
|---|---|
| Universal domination ban | Revised to conditional D1. Persistence alone does not identify a dynamical class. |
| Zero resistance ⇒ motion | Not derived. Driving, preparation and an evolution law remain necessary parts of the model. |
| K3 / χ=24 | A sharp bound within explicit manifold assumptions; no selection of our universe, size or unique metric. |
| Positive K3 cost = physical action | The tested entanglement-equilibrium coefficients do not fit the positive cost family. The conditional mathematical bound remains valid. |
| 24 → α | No parameter-free electromagnetic prediction. Fields, flux sector, normalisation, spectrum and running remain essential. |
| N_gen=χ/8=3 | Arithmetic is not a particle-spectrum derivation. Conditional family-counting models have additional assumptions. |
| ε≈1 | A choice or estimate within a specified model, not a measured universal scale. |
| Born from multiplicative weights | Amplitudes, norm and composition require additional assumptions. |
| Measured 0.458 proves a topological term | The lattice Yang–Mills ratio has a 1/N² correction; this does not identify its origin as the EEML term. |
| 3D memory confirms EEML | The cited results are a theoretical construction and numerical evidence; no EEML-specific hardware test. |
| 25 equal-status laws | Replaced by four distinct layers and conditional working rules. Historical formulations remain archived. |
Conditional exponential weighting, exact reductions, geometric bounds and concrete process models remain useful. The next task is to justify model inputs independently and predict a different experiment or perturbation. None of the new examples derives 137 or establishes the global topology of our universe.
Test status → · Verification → · History →v0.26 · 28 September 2026